Grumble magazine

From a recent article in the New York Times:

"ATLANTIC CITY -- In what will be the most extensive overhaul of the Atlantic City beauty contest since it started in 1921, the producers of the Miss America pageant announced changes...that unapologetically borrow aspects of programs like "Big Brother" and "The Weakest Link" as well as crowd-pleasing devices from television's most highly rated events."

Rapture.

Well, no one's gonna accuse the braintrust over at Tiaras-R-Us of taking it too slow around the learning curve. Faced with the sort of flat Nielsen ratings that'll get your gala booted from the Atlantic City Convention Center and Tax Sump in favor of a boat show, the powers that be have decided to divest the nation's favorite gown-gawk of whatever remaining shame it has hitherto possessed. With the sort of insight that one can gain only from a combination of (oog) market research and high-level meetings with (egads) network television executives, the Miss America Organization has decided to tart up its three-hour whirlwind even more than usual this time around. The events have been substantially changed. The scoring has been drastically reformulated. The production squad behind "Britney Spears in Hawaii" and "The Teen Choice Awards" will have their oleaginous little mitts on the controls -- and with those credits, you can bet the young ladies will be well served.

And, to inject a hot dose of spectacle and excitement into the affair, the show will be, if the Times is to be believed, "ushering in a new era of high-stakes reality TV."

To be fair, the pageant politburo has refrained from going full-auto crazy with Survivoresque tomfoolery. No one is going to be eating rats (unless Miss New Jersey decides to play to her strengths in the talent competition); no one is going to accidentally set themselves on fire (unless Miss Pennsylvania misgauges the wind speed during her balance-a-'75-Pinto-on-your-head trick); and no one is going to be walking around stark naked on stage (unless, of course, we all get very, very, very lucky).

But make no mistake: changes have been made. Pageant president and Lothario-without-portfolio Robert M. Renneisen, Jr., hopes that "some controversy surrounds what we're doing so people who might not otherwise tune in will watch the show." Controversy? At the Miss America Pageant? Last time that happened, we got Vanessa Williams, speaking of parading around stark naked. And that was during the Reagan administration. (Remember the Reagan years? 'Cause the contestants sure don't. The youngest of them were all of 3 years old at the time.) While one shouldn't begrudge Mr. Renneisen his stratospheric Neilsen numbers, true controversy will be hard to come by, unless the man's planning on dumping peyote into the Vaseline during the commercials.

Messr. Renneisen's delusions notwithstanding, the fact remains that the Miss America pageant we all know and love, or at least deftly change the channel to avoid, has been radically refurbished. The press release on the pageant's official website details the full complement of nips, tucks, ab-crunches, and stomach stapling that the Big Night has undergone, all cheerfully performed for the greater good of reinvigorating the evening's festivities, and more importantly, shedding new insight on the talent, sacrifice, and just plain old All-American wonderfulness of the 50 or so Nice Young Women.

But will it be better? More exciting? Riddled with suspense? Maybe, maybe not. The old system had its flaws, about which I've gone into explicit detail elsewhere. Yet my combined sense of duty, fairness, and getting the Head Icthyoid In Charge of this gigabyte-glossy off my back demands that I re-fight the battle anew.

According to the Miss America website, some of the "improvements" include:


The Red Carpet Arrival

What It Is: The telecast will open with all 50 contestants arriving at Boardwalk Hall by limousine, presumably with fans a-throbbing and paparazzi a-clicking behind the customary velvet-rope crowd barriers.
What It Hopes To Accomplish: The grandeur and excitement of the Academy Awards.
What Springs To Mind: That someone's been watching to many E! specials. Apparently, if exposing the viewing public to hideous fashion mistakes and encouraging them to ponder how much spirit gum was needed to epoxy that dress to Miss Florida's tuchus is good enough for the Oscars, it's good enough for Miss America. Do we, as a nation, truly need to hear the adenoidal whine of professional agony aunt Joan Rivers as she accosts a poor, unsuspecting Miss Alaska? I think not.

The Jury Room

What It Is: Periodically, the TV audience will get a sneak peek into the "Jury Room," i.e., the offstage area where they keep the 41 non-finalists.
What It Hopes To Accomplish: Letting the viewers hear their discussion about the top 10 finalists, and their overall views on what sort of girl should be the next Miss America. One network executive was confident that the segment would not reveal "the gossip of sore losers," but rather give viewers "a better understanding of the competition process."
What Springs To Mind: What a refreshingly naïve concept. A "better understanding of the competition process" would never in a million years reveal a maelstrom of runny mascara, torn sashes, broken furniture, and white-hot temper explosions. Never.
      In point of fact, this isn't a bad idea, if you prefer to indulge a cruel streak. Who wouldn't want to see one of the losers (sorry, "non-finalists"...much like Germany was a "non-finalist" in World Wars I through II, I suspect...) eschew the usual description of the current favorite as a "fine example of the qualities that Miss America needs" in favor of the ever more entertaining and perceptive "smack-shooting skank-beast"?

Audience Participation

What It Is: This year, enthusiastic supporters representing all of the contestants' home states will be on display, equipped with state flags, placards, and banners to support their home girl.
What It Hopes To Accomplish: The emotionally-charged atmosphere of the different state delegations, all pulling together to boost their respective girl's confidence and maybe, just maybe, tip the scales in her favor.
What Springs To Mind: Hooligans with too much time on their hands. In Europe, they'd get water-cannoned and riot-batoned; here, they get unabashed national live TV coverage. Prepare yourself for a lot of signs that say things like MISS IDAHO 3:16.

Poise, Presence, and Family

What It Is: In the grand tradition of coming-out parties and yacht-club cotillions everywhere, each contestant will be escorted onstage by her father, brother, or a special male relative during the "Poise and Presence" (i.e., evening gown) portion of the show.
What It Hopes To Accomplish: To remind the viewers that the contestants are "real people, with real lives." (Hand to God, it's right there on the website.)
What Springs To Mind: Real people with real lives? You mean there isn't some lab someplace where they grow them? And for that matter, whose bright idea was it to drag the contestants' pug-ugly male relatives away from the Keno tables at the Harrah's across the street and subject the viewing audience to them? No one, I guarantee, cares to see the side of the family where the beauty most emphatically did not come from.

The Knowledge Quiz

What It Is: For the first time ever (and there's no doubt in my mind about the truth of this), the top 5 finalists will answer a series of questions about issues relevant to Miss America, and to young women in general.
What It Hopes To Accomplish: Giving each contestant the opportunity to distinguish herself as a young woman sensitive to and well-versed in U.S. history, government, and current events.
What Springs To Mind: Sweet jumping Aquinas. Fine, let's see what Miss Rhode Island really knows. Who was the Wisconsin senator who formed the Progressive Party at the turn of the century? Who won the 1958 World Series? How can America project a strong presence in Europe without sacrificing its own vital domestic interests? What time is the 10:00 news on?
      There have already been complaints about this, according to the Times. One local pageant director from Arkansas went so far as to say that this "could make a smart contestant look stupid." (No, dear, stupidity makes you looks stupid. As, probably, does being from Arkansas, but that's another issue.) And how exactly is this Regis rip-off going to work on stage? (Would you like a lifeline, Miss Illinois? Ask the audience? Sure. How about asking those drunken prats in the fifth balcony with I-L-L-I-N-O-I-S painted on their bare chests? I'm sure they'd be boatloads of help.... )

Up-Close-and-Personal

What It Is: Each of the top-10 finalists will be the subject of a video "scrapbook" of their lives leading up to the Big Night itself.
What It Hopes To Accomplish: Expanding an already highly popular segment in the telecast.
What Springs To Mind: That they couldn't sell enough ad time and needed to, if you'll pardon the expression, pad the evening. This would be worthwhile if someone sneaked in a grainy COPS video of Miss Mississippi getting hauled away by the state National Guard for chaining herself to a Starbucks in protest of something or other, but if we're gonna have to sit through the same tired home movies of grade-school cheerleading competitions, high-school productions of "The Wizard of Oz," and montages of the contestants' charity work in getting certified in CPR for cute little forest animals, it's better that the production lop 20 minutes off the end of the night and send us all to bed early. We won't hold it against them.

The Eighth Judge

What It Is: For the first time, the 41 non-finalists (there's that euphemism again) will cast votes and act as an "eighth judge" in the final round of scoring. This tribunal will discuss and vote upon who they best believe represents the "values, motivations, and expectations of young American women."
What It Hopes To Accomplish: An honest look into the mind of the typical Miss America contestant (unnerving as that might prove). Network executives have said that this will provide a realistic bellwether of the contestants' mindset, by "having the actual contestants tell us why someone appears to be a front runner." (Apart from the usual gossip regarding which of the judges the front-runner showcased her talent to, if you know what I mean.) According to the network, this new facet will "provide a mirror of what's going on in living rooms around the country."
What Springs To Mind: Considering that the last two and a half hours have been crammed with 50 serious babes parading around in beachwear on stage, one really doesn't want to be forced to contemplate what's going on in some of those living rooms.

As if the above weren't enough examples of lily-gilding, they've retooled the old familiar competition categories:
  • The Swimsuit Competition is now part of the more-politically correct "Lifestyle and Fitness" category. (Presumably because they couldn't get the network to agree on calling it the "Binge and Purge" category.)
  • The Interview Competition is now the "Presentation and Community Achievement" category, which will give the judges an opportunity to learn as much as they can about each contestant, and determine how well she articulates her platform of community service. (As opposed to the usual rambling-on for five minutes about her very important platform statement: "Why Mean People Are Total Poopheads.")
  • The Talent Competition is now the "Artistic Expression" category. (Another bit of proof that they're determined to turn this into the Olympic Ice-Dancing finals. Talent, arguably, is something you can measure; if Miss Oregon can't keep all those plates spinning on top of their sticks, she gets marked off. Artistic Expression, however, means nothing. Can anyone really judge this? What happens if Miss West Virginia does a spot-welded abstract representation of Man's Inhumanity To Man, or, more likely, Man's Inhumanity To Baby Seals? How the hell do you score that?)

Although all of this reconstructive surgery seems too much, the pageanteers are adamant -- perhaps a little too adamant -- that it represents the findings of their research. The American public want to see "more competition among the women" and a "more accurate gauge of the intelligence that contestants possess." This may be true, but whether grafting a load of gimmickry onto the evening results in a more accurate gauge of anything is still up in the air. Whether the American public wants to get a deeper appreciation of the intelligence of the average Miss America contestant, or just wants a spot-check on whether she knows which end of the scissors to grip when cutting the grand opening ribbon at the local Jiffy Lube, is a question best left to the Fates.

Or maybe the American public just wants to see some good old-fashioned mud-wrestling. Can't get better high-stakes reality TV than that.



This Issue Older Stuff About Us Drink This!
Copyright © 1996-2006 Grumble magazine. All rights reserved.